Relevant to Taos Real Estate News Articles
The Price of Going Green Payback From Earth-Friendly Products
Takes Years; Can a House Be Too Eco?
By JUNE FLETCHER February 29, 2008; Page W8 - Wall Street
Journal
Most homeowners like the idea of going green -- until they
get the bill.
With home sales slumping and consumers rethinking their remodeling budgets,
building contractors and suppliers are dangling green upgrades. They hope
that energy-efficient systems and products made from sustainably harvested
materials will hook consumers concerned about global warming, pollution
and natural resources.
Contractor estimates ranged from $700,000 to $800,000 and still didn't include
everything the couple wanted. In the end, they tore down the house, salvaged
or gave away most of it and spent $1.2 million, not including the original
purchase, to build a custom-designed, 2,700-square-foot replacement. It
was "the right thing to do," says Ms. Porter, a nonprofit project
manager. Even though many of the upgrades will help keep energy costs down,
she adds, "I don't expect we'll get back all the money that we paid
in our lifetimes."
In fact, earning back the green premium can take years, not counting rebates
and incentives that may be available from government agencies. Enermodal
calculates a payback period of more than 10 years for the most extreme green
measures, including super-efficient furnaces and water-thrifty faucets.
Systems integrator Solar Depot estimates a solar hot-water system will pay
for itself in eight to 10 years, depending on the climate, site and home
size; a solar radiant floor-heating system will take five to six years.
But considering the average U.S. homeowner lives in a house only seven years
before moving, many will need more than the hope of lower utility bills
to inspire a green remodeling. (And some green products, such as bamboo
floors, don't save any money.)
LIGHTBULB PAYBACK
Yet there are some items with relatively short paybacks.
EnergyStar.gov, an Environmental Protection Agency Web site, estimates a
3.5-year payback period for the $200 premium on an Energy Star-rated electric
clothes washer costing $500 and a 3.1-year payback for the $30 premium on
an Energy Star side-by-side refrigerator costing $1,100. Compact fluorescent
light bulbs -- which go for about five times the price of incandescent bulbs
-- pay back their extra cost in about four months.
Mark Silberman, a retired wine-store owner, plans to tear down a four-bedroom
split level in Norwalk, Conn., he bought seven years ago for $500,000 and
spend about that amount again to rebuild. He has just begun making his way
through the dizzying array of green options -- earthen roofs, gray-water
irrigation systems, geothermal heating, recycled shingles. Since all these
things could add 20% to his final cost, he figures he'll probably just pick
those that make the house less drafty and expensive to heat. "If something
helps save the earth's resources, that's an extra bonus," he says.
Cost has been a stumbling block to the green building movement ever since
interest in solar homes, sod-topped buildings and dome houses took root
in the 1960s. Ratings standards such as Energy Star and the U.S. Green Building
Council's LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) point system
help people evaluate costs and benefits.
GROCERY-BAG DECKS
John Kurowski, a Denver builder who began building "green" homes
in 1974, says there is more to consider than just the bottom line. For example,
one of the most cost-effective remodeling steps is to caulk and insulate
thoroughly. Yet making a building too tight can hurt indoor air quality.
"You have to look at the entire system," he says. And some green
products can have other downsides. Deck-material makers Trex and TimberTech
were early producers of composites blending plastic with reclaimed lumberyard
sawdust to create a semisynthetic "lumber" that wouldn't splinter
or rot. But with time, the embedded wood tended to stain, scratch and attract
mold.
The companies say they have largely conquered the mold with chemical additives.
But they also have launched "virgin" polyvinyl chloride decking
that they say is more scratch- and stain-resistant. Tom Lent, policy director
of an environmental group, the Healthy Building Network, calls pure PVC
decks a "disaster environmentally." Anthony Cavanna, chief financial
officer of Trex, says 99% of its products are still made using recycled
plastic grocery bags. Carey Walley, a TimberTech spokeswoman, says a pure
PVC deck, with a 25-year warranty, is "more sustainable" than
pressure-treated wood, which may need replacing after 10 years.
The greenest home, though, may be the one you live in now, given the cost
in dollars and pollution of ripping out old materials and producing and
shipping new ones, the National Trust for Historic Preservation noted in
a recent issue of the magazine Preservation. New York architect Andrew Kotchen
reminds clients they can save energy and fossil fuels simply by building
smaller mansions. "Bigger isn't better," he says.
